Recommended Reading / Theory

How Naive Theories Drive Opposing Inferences from the Same Information

Helen Deval article

How Naive Theories Drive Opposing Inferences from the Same Information
Hélène Deval, Susan P. Mantel, Frank R. Kardes, and Steven S. Posavac

Journal of Consumer Research
Vol. 39, No. 6 (April 2013), pp. 1185-1201
Published by The University of Chicago Press

[Registration required to access full article]

Consumers often make inferences to fill in gaps in knowledge when they do not have complete information regarding products. Eight experiments show that consumers often have contradictory naive theories about the implications of common market phenomena and that they draw different conclusions as a function of which naive theory is primed, even when available information is held constant. Results indicate that conflicting naive theories about pricing, sales promotion, product popularity versus scarcity, and technical language drive product evaluation. Consumers who have expertise in a given product category are less susceptible to the priming of a naive theory. This research contributes to more precise understanding of how consumers will respond to different levels of key marketing variables and how marketing tactics can backfire.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s